Skip to main content

Module 6

This week, I reflected on how I can use technology to assist in planning enriching lessons, units, and curricula and applied the knowledge I gathered from the Bauer (2020) chapter to create an outline for an engaging WebQuest. There are many factors to consider when using any technology for instructional purposes. For example, when planning my WebQuest and including videos, articles, websites, and assessment pieces, I contemplated what I wanted my students to gain from the experience, the accessibility of each piece for the specific students that will complete this WebQuest, and the prior knowledge students will have when they complete the assignment. In addition, if I were to publish, share, or sell my WebQuest on Teachers Pay Teachers, I would need to be mindful of copyright laws, using materials in the public domain and pictures from a creative commons site. 

Because WebQuests are at the Redefinition level of the SAMR Model of Technology Integration, and the task I set for the students is entirely novel, I had to think creatively and reflect on how to tailor the experience to help students understand what I hoped they would learn. To do so, I utilized backward design. Backward design is the most logical way to plan lessons and units because teachers must "begin with the end in mind" (p. 147). It is challenging to facilitate meaningful learning experiences without knowing beforehand what students should aim to accomplish. In my WebQuest, I began with the objectives and found online resources that could help students understand and progress to meet the target objectives. 

WebQuests are also an example of Project-Based Learning. My students will put themselves in the shoes of a coach or teacher and complete the assignment through the lens of a tangible life experience. They will problem-solve and synthesize information individually, then have a chance to collaborate after they finish all of the necessary steps. While designing my WebQuest, I kept in mind that learning is contextual, active, social, and reflective. Therefore, I attempted to include each of these elements in the WebQuest experience for my students. I place students in the context of a teacher role and provide information that allows students to build upon their prior knowledge. Additionally, students will actively implement the strategies they learn about in their practice sessions. Finally, when the experience concludes, students will reflect with one another on whether or not they met their goals.

This week also made me reflect on how I currently use technology to differentiate learning for students and the assistive technologies I have already made without even knowing it. I immediately thought of my teaching style during online learning during the pandemic. In every lesson, I had to make sure that I created assignments, visuals, and presentations that catered to visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learners. In other words, I provided "multiple means of engagement" (p. 156). I also offered scaffolds for students who had trouble learning from a distance. For example, I sent home recorders with colored stickers to help struggling students with their hand placement and matched fingering charts to the colors on the stickers. These differentiations required basic knowledge of technology and a willingness to try new things and be creative.

Reference:

Bauer, W. I. (2020). Music learning today: Digital pedagogy for creating, performing, and responding to music (2nd ed.)Oxford University Press.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Module 3

This week opened my eyes to technologies that assist students in creating musical compositions. The reading from Bauer (2020) reminded me of a heated debate that I observed in my undergraduate studies that argued sound versus sight for music learning. I believe in sound-before-sight pedagogy, which strengthens students' audiation and allows them to think more musically and less rigidly. Having strong audiation enables students to "think in music" and become fluent, capable musicians before learning standard notation. While composition software has the potential to support musical literacy, teachers must ensure that their lessons use technology to enhance concepts and further student growth rather than create shortcuts that inhibit musicality.  For example, suppose students do not have strong audiation skills before exploring some of the technologies mentioned in the chapter. In that case, they may not be able to use technology to compose high-quality, coherent musical wor...

Module 2

This week, our course material discussed the processes teacher can use to engage students in creative music-making, including technologies that help facilitate these creative experiences. In particular, Bauer's (2020) text focused on improvisation. Bauer asserts that becoming fluent musically follows similar processes to becoming fluent in a language. First, teachers must give students small doses of improvisatory activities to build students' confidence and mitigate their fear of failure. Activities should begin with listening activities and simple echo patterns. Then, teachers should progress through various scaffolds like question-and-answer form, improvising variations, creating transcriptions, and group improvisation before students should be expected to improvise freely. While leading students through these scaffolds, teachers must emphasize the importance of learning by trial and error. Failure in the creative process is an inevitable and necessary step toward gaining im...